Deep due-diligence on any entity
Registry footprint, sanctions screening, 90 days of drift, the Trust Stack composite with pillar breakdown, cross-surface consensus, risk indicators — every data product Entidex ships, composed into one auditable report.
A Snapshot tells you where an entity stands right now. A Drift Report tells you what has moved and why. A Trust Dossier is the report you hand up when a deal is on the line — the shape a due-diligence workflow needs, with everything cited, dated and auditable back to the observation behind it.
What’s in the report
Canonical identity
The resolved entity — canonical name, Wikidata QID, LEI, CIK, Companies House number where applicable, disambiguation history and identity-lock provenance. One record, no confusion with a same-named person or entity.
Registry & sanctions
GLEIF LEI, SEC EDGAR filer submissions, Companies House, OFAC SDN and UK OFSI sanctions screening. Positive-presence rows for legal-entity IDs; sanctions matches surfaced as review-flagged watchlist hits, never asserted.
Trust Stack composite
Confidence-weighted score across source concordance, inter-platform consistency, entity maturity, sentiment, discovery coverage, narrative coverage and domain integrity — with the three-pillar breakdown so the number never asks you to trust it blind.
90 days of drift
Every score movement, lifecycle transition, cross-surface divergence event and early-warning spike over the window — cause-attributed and cited back to the observations that produced it.
Cross-surface consensus
Which sources agree, which disagree, and how the gap has moved over the window. The AI-engines row answers the specific question a due-diligence lead needs: do the models match public record, and is that alignment widening or narrowing?
Risk indicators
Truth gaps between the verified record and AI claims, conflation risk for person entities, fabricated-source rate, and every open drift event with an unresolved narrative. The list a legal or comms team needs before a decision is signed.
Every claim, auditable
Nothing in a Trust Dossier is asserted without evidence. Every fact carries a source surface, an observation time and a confidence value. Every score carries its Confidence Layer. Every drift event is anchored back to the observations that produced it. That is the difference between a report that survives being challenged in a boardroom and a report that does not.
Sanctions screening the honest way
Sanctions and PEP matches are exact-name hits against public open-data lists — treated as claims to verify, not verdicts to publish. The dossier surfaces them as review-flagged watchlist hits so a human can adjudicate; the list identity is admin-only in the UI to prevent defamatory false-positive exposure. This is a diligence tool, not a compliance attestation.
Where it fits
Trust Dossier is the M&A, investment, senior-hire and partnership use case. For ongoing monitoring, pair a Dossier with recurring Drift Reports so any change after signing surfaces immediately. For an entry point, Insight Snapshot gives the picture at one moment for £19. See the due-diligence use case for the applied workflow.
Go deeper with Entidex
The full entity intelligence platform — beyond Explore Entidex
- Continuous multi-source entity observation
- Alerts when sources diverge or drift
- Cross-surface consensus + visibility over time
- Evidence-anchored intelligence reports
Frequently asked questions
What is a Trust Dossier?
A long-form, auditable report composed from every data product Entidex ships — Entity Profile plus the full Trust Stack plus every source surface plus 90 days of drift plus risk indicators plus registry footprint (GLEIF LEI, SEC EDGAR filings, sanctions screening, Companies House). It is the report you hand up when a deal, a hire or a partnership is on the line.
How is it different from a Drift Report or a Snapshot?
A Snapshot is one moment. A Drift Report is a window of changes. A Trust Dossier composes both, adds the full registry footprint (legal-entity IDs, filer history, sanctions screening), the Trust Stack composite with pillar breakdown, 90 days of drift with cause attribution, and risk indicators — the shape a due-diligence workflow needs, not a marketing-analytics one.
What does registry screening actually cover?
GLEIF LEI (a live listing on the global legal-entity identifier registry), SEC EDGAR (US filer submissions), OFAC SDN and UK OFSI sanctions screening (exact-name match, review-flagged not asserted), and Companies House. OpenSanctions PEP and OpenCorporates are wired and activate when their API keys are provisioned. Sanctions matches surface as "watchlist match (under review)" — a review-flagged hit, never an accusation. Sanctions false positives are defamatory; the design keeps every list identity admin-only and requires human verification.
How does the AI-visibility layer fit into a due-diligence report?
Two ways. First, cross-engine consensus (or divergence) across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok is itself a signal — a target whose story every engine tells the same way is different from one where the engines disagree. Second, the Trust Stack composite fuses source concordance, inter-platform consistency, entity maturity, sentiment, discovery coverage, narrative coverage and domain integrity into a single confidence-weighted number — with the pillar breakdown surfaced so the score never asks you to trust it blind.
How much does it cost?
Per-report Trust Dossiers are £199–£499 depending on depth (single-entity, cohort, or full M&A pack). Pro Plus (£249/mo) and Agency (£299/mo) include unlimited Trust Dossiers. Enterprise adds bespoke sourcing and delivery formats.
What does the report look like — is it downloadable?
A dated, permanent report page with structured sections (identity, registry, headline signals, Trust Stack, 90d drift, cross-surface consensus, risk indicators, cited evidence), suitable for archival and citation. A PDF export is planned; Pro Plus and Agency subscribers can request bespoke delivery formats on Enterprise terms.